Crossing the Finish Line

jLooks like this is the end of the line, an end of an entire semester’s worth of media criticism. And also the end of an entire college career in my case. But before I plunge into the scary world of real life, it’s time for one more blog post to wrap up the semester! So you might be wondering what I could possibly talk about to tie things off. Well, we’re going to be ending by commenting on other people’s work with critiques and general thoughts on what they wrote.

Sounds like a daunting thing, right? It’s every freshman’s nightmare in a writing workshop, where they don’t know what else to say but ‘fantastic‘ so they don’t hurt someone’s feelings. But writing comments and critiques – and also receiving them yourself – is one of the best ways to help out with writing! If my first blog post made absolutely no sense in discussing media criticism, then how else would I know unless someone told me? So, join me in reading the comments I made on several of my classmate’s work! Links are provided at the beginning of the comment, so you can look at their work as well!

To Evan Alfano…

As I’ve learned in my previous mass communications classes, South Park is definitely one of the best shows to analyse for media criticism since it’s just fun! I was happy to see that you picked that show to apply Semiotics to.

I think you did a fantastic job explaining just what media criticism is and why people should care about it. I laughed at the GIF you put at the bottom of your post, which gives me the idea of putting GIFs into my future blog posts.

imageHowever, I do think that you should have introduced South Park into the discussion earlier in your blog post, and maybe used it as an outlet to show how media criticism is worth while. Is South Park just funny satire of society, or is it giving us messages regardless? How would South Park become different when you think about it in a critical lens? How would you apply the definition of media criticism to South Park?

I also believe you could say more about Semiotics towards South Park. A lot of what you said is about how someone would apply Semiotics to South Park rather than showing us how you can put Semiotics into South Park. Go into depth into the Semiotic approach to South Park, delve into a rough analysis while reminding the reader that they could read it in a completely different way and still have a valid interpretation!

Otherwise, it was a great read! Keep up the good work!

To Julio Gonzalez…

Honestly, your blog was awesome, covering all the bases on media criticism, semiotics, and structuralism! While I personally had never watched Orange is the New Black before, I felt like I had a basic understanding of the show. Or at least enough to understand what sort of direction you were taking with your analysis through semiotics.

Orange-is-the-New-BlackOne thing I would have liked to see more of is how a counter-argument could be developed, like if someone didn’t agree with your reading of Orange is the New Black, then how could they use the same tools to find their own reading. Be a guide for those who could potentially disagree and be open to it all.

A complaint I had about your article was that the video to the trailer was at the bottom of the blog. It could have been easily inserted into the middle of the blog, and I felt like I was disrupted during my reading since I had to scroll all the way down to watch the video. Since you were using the trailer for your analysis, you should include it inside the blog post because even watchers of the show may need a reference point to where you’re taking the interpretations from.

But otherwise, awesome job!

To Jihye Kim…

Awesome job in explaining what media criticism is and how people can use it in their regular life! I think you really honed in how people use it to oppose the hegemonic forces that the media enforces on the consume, which was a direction that I hadn’t seen in a lot of other blogs I looked at. Definitely taking this more revolutionary attitude is really cool and can get people to pay attention!

dolce-gabbana-spring-summer-2016-campaign08One critique I do have is that you should have introduced semiotics as your primary media device a little earlier! That way your audience would know what to concentrate on when you’re describing all the ways that you can analyse a text!

I thought it was really interesting to see your perspective of the piece of media that you were critiquing! It is definitely interesting to see a perspective that isn’t American who is looking into what we consume as a culture! I think you did a good job of explaining it from your point of view as well!

One thing you could have included is to describe how someone could do it for themselves. Maybe describe how certain women look and then pose a few different way in which someone could interpret them? Or show how they could develop their counter-argument by describing how you came to the conclusions about the ad!

Awesome job!

By looking at my classmate’s blogs, I also discovered how I could find flaws in my own work. Basically, when you look for flaws in someone else’s work and helping them by providing constructive criticism, you can discover how to find the same things in your own work and improve for yourself. And also, since this is for a mass communications class, commenting helps you with developing communication skills to peers. Nobody likes it when someone just says it’s good without any constructive feedback, right?

And thus ends my journey through media criticism. I hope you enjoyed my blog posts as I enjoyed creating them for you enjoyment! Taylor McQueeney, signing off!


Opposites Attract in Media Criticism

Hello everyone, and welcome to my blog! I’m Taylor McQueeney, and I’ll be your host for this post…and the rest of the posts that’ll come in the near future. You see, I’m making this blog for a class at Towson University that focuses on media criticism. What is media criticism, you ask? It’s looking at different types of media, such as television and advertisements, through different views and seeing how we as viewers can obtain meaning from that. Remember when you were in high school, and your teacher asked you to decipher the true meaning of Frankenstein or some other required piece of literature? Same concept, except instead it’s all about culture and, most notably, not focused on old literature your teacher forced you to read.

So at this point, you might be asking yourself something along the lines of “Taylor, why should we even read this? You just compared media criticism to my high school English class!” And to that, I say that there’s quite a lot to learn from applying media criticism to the things you regularly watch. I call it learning to be more aware of the messages found in the stuff you consume regularly. It doesn’t have to be something that ruins the entertainment you watch, it’s just being aware and just knowing not to take the messages too seriously. After all, we’re all smart people. And being smart means knowing not to ruin everything for yourself. Because that’s just not fun, right?
But honestly, I could exsnow_compromiso_serahplain this for a long time and I don’t think just explaining is worth as much as actually doing it. So instead of droning on some more, how about we look at something and apply a type of media criticism to it? If you follow the little link here, you’ll find a cut-scene from the video game Final Fantasy XIII. For those of you who don’t know, Final Fantasy XIII is a Japanese role-playing game developed by Square-Enix. It follows the story of six different characters who become tasked with a mission to destroy their world. This task is branded onto them with a special mark that makes them a Pulse L’Cie, and not fulfilling their task means certain death. So throughout the game, the characters battle with whether to go through with it or not as they’re hunted as traitors by the police.

This particular scene is a flashback of one of the main characters, Snow, recalls the moments after he proposed to his long-time girlfriend, Serah, who was also branded a Pulse L’Cie. Before I get on with the whole analysis, I’m going to point out a few of the things that went on during the cut-scene. This will be relevant later, I swear!

So in the cut-scene, it begins with a view of fireworks. Serah and Snow fly into the frame on a little aircraft of sorts, with Snow the driver. They discuss their engagement and Serah also tries to talk about her status as a Pulse L’Cie. During their discussion, Snow flies into the fireworks, which nearly causes the two to be hit directly by a firework. Then they have a small romantic moment before flying away when Serah begins to cry.

maxresdefaultNow, after we have looked at the clip we’re going to be analyzing and picked out what happens during it, it’s time to apply the criticism. But media criticism isn’t just one singular concept applied to a piece of media. Instead, it’s a bunch of different theories that you are free to pick and choose to your heart’s content. What we’re going to be using in order to analyse this scene from Final Fantasy XIII is semiotics.

Semiotics is, simply put, the study of signs. Signs are anything that could signify something else like an actual thing or idea. An example would be how a cross is a sign of Christianity, which would be the signified. In this way of media criticism, one can sort signs by a syntagmatic approach, which studies the signs in sequence, or a paradigmatic approach, which studies signs as individuals working separately to create a message. In this example, we will be using both approaches just to show how differently things can work when looking at signs.

First, let’s identify the signs. Remember when I explained what happened during the clip? This will include a bunch of those! First, there is the fireworks. In most cultures, fireworks are used as celebration in most cultures. Sometimes, fireworks are even used as venues for a romance scene. In this  scene, based on the dialogue of Snow, it is also a source of hope. Snow states that he wished on the fireworks for Serah to say yes to his proposal, so it was wishing on hope for his dreams to come true.

maxresdefault1The second sign is in Snow himself, who seems to signify masculinity. He is muscular, much larger than Serah, and consistently shows that he is protective of Serah in both body language and words. Also, there is the fact that he drives right into the danger of fireworks just so he can impress his fiance. If you don’t know what I mean by body language, look at how he is when it comes to Serah. When they nearly get shot down, he tucks her into his chest acting as a shield. While riding the air vehicle, she is safe between his arms while he’s driving. And at the end, when Serah begins to cry, he holds her to him as they fly away.

On contrast, Serah acts as a sign of femininity. She is very small, with cute hair and a short skirt. Honestly, it looks like Snow can break her arm with a flick of the wrist. In addition, though this  isn’t shown in the clip, she does not fight the entire game and acts as a damsel in distress most of the time. While they were in the fireworks, she admires the pretty lights. When they are nearly shot down, she only screams and lets Snow save the day with his quick thinking. Not only that, but Serah is the only truly emotional one of the pair. Snow isn’t completely stone-faced, but he deflects raw emotion with distractions, using fireworks to keep Serah from thinking about sad things. At the end, Serah begins to cry despite Snow’s efforts.

So now that I have the major signs nailed down, let’s first look at the syntagmatic way of organizing the signs. In the sequence, the scene starts with the fireworks, a source of hope and romance for the two lovers. Then, Snow and Serah fly in and talk about their hopes for the future, such as their future wedding and Serah’s hope that her sister will accept her as a Pulse L’Cie. Then, they fly beyond the safety net and they nearly kiss in the middle of the romantic fireworks. When the fireworks nearly shoot them down, which can be seen as their hopes being shot down or dangerous, they fly off with Snow protecting Serah. They laugh and have a romantic moment only for Serah to be brought into tears, her feminine emotions, and they end the scene by flying off.

bodhum_fireworksNow, let’s look at the paradigmatic way of looking at the signs. In this version, we are going to use something called binary opposition to figure out how exactly know how these signs are figured out in our heads. Binary opposition is how two things contrast on opposite ends, and we regularly use it to figure out why something is based on what it is not. For example, we know that there are fireworks in the scene because it isn’t daytime and they are explosions that people are admiring instead of running away from. If Serah looked at the fireworks in terror instead of admiring them, we would have assumed that they were a bad thing. But since both Snow and Serah look at them with smiles, we know that they are a good thing.

Probably the largest example of binary opposition can be found in the two main characters that signify masculinity and femininity. Both Snow and Serah are binary opposites of each other, with Snow being everything Serah is not and vice versa. Serah is a small, helpless woman who needs Snow to rescue her from the fireworks. Snow is large, acts as a hero to Serah in both dialogue and action, and acts as Serah’s protector. They are complete opposites of each other as both characters and signs. This defines binary opposition. Because of how they are created, Snow and Serah act as the definitions of masculinity and femininity. If you want to know how Final Fantasy XIII defines what a woman is, then all you have to look at is what Snow isn’t and what Serah is.

And that is basically why someone should know at least a little about media criticism. Through looking at the signs of masculinity and femininity in Final Fantasy XIII, we figured out just how a woman should look like according to the game’s creators. The beauty of media that you take in a lot of messages while consuming them. People learn about their world partially through the media they consume, so just letting these messages go by undetected could alter someone’s world view. By knowing, we can see exactly what the creators of media want us to know. Even by just having a passing knowledge, we can be more aware of what’s going on.